Most people I talk to are already using AI. It just hasn't changed how they work.
Most people already use AI as a thought partner. They open a chat, talk through a problem, and get something useful back. But the work still gets done the way it always was. Inside teams I see the same thing on a bigger scale: nearly everyone experimenting on their own, one or two people racing ahead, and no shared agreement on what AI is for or what it's allowed to touch.
At the start of this year I used AI the way most people do, as a chat partner. Now I lead a small team of AI agents, the same way I've led people for twenty years: I give them context and a clear standard, check their work, and make the decisions. It's raised the quality, the range, and the amount of what I can produce, well beyond what I could reach on my own.
The research now shows both directions: people who accept whatever AI hands them get worse at thinking. People who direct it get better. Every system I build keeps the decisions with you. That is what I help people and organizations do.